The Cyphernomicon

6. The Need For Strong Crypto

6.1. copyright
THE CYPHERNOMICON: Cypherpunks FAQ and More, Version 0.666,
1994-09-10, Copyright Timothy C. May. All rights reserved.
See the detailed disclaimer. Use short sections under «fair
use» provisions, with appropriate credit, but don’t put your
name on my words.

6.2. SUMMARY: The Need For Strong Crypto
6.2.1. Main Points

Strong crypto reclaims the power to decide for one’s self,
to deny the «Censor» the power to choose what one reads,
watches, or listens to.
6.2.2. Connections to Other Sections
6.2.3. Where to Find Additional Information
6.2.4. Miscellaneous Comments
this section is short, but is less focussed than other
sections; it is essentially a «transition» chapter.

6.3. General Uses of and Reasons for Crypto
6.3.1. (see also the extensive listing of «Reasons for Anonymity,»
which makes many points about the need and uses for strong
crypto)
6.3.2. «Where is public key crypto really needed?»

«It is the case that there is relatively little need for
asymmetric key cryptography in small closed populations.
For example, the banks get along quite well without. The
advantage of public key is that it permits private
communication in a large and open population and with a
minimum of prearrangement.» [WHMurray, sci.crypt, 1994-08-
25]
That is, symmetric key systems (such as conventional
ciphers, one time pads, etc.) work reasonably well by
prearrangement between parties. And of course one time pads
have the additional advantage of being information-
theoretically secure. But asymmetric or public key methods
are incredibly useful when: the parties have not met
before, when key material has not been exchanged, and when
concerns exist about storing the key material. The so-
called «key management problem» when N people want to
communicate pairwise with each other is well-founded.
And of course public key crypto makes possible all the
other useful stuff like digital money, DC-Nets, zero
knowledge proofs, secret sharing, etc.
6.3.3. «What are the main reasons to use cryptography?»
people encrypt for the same reason they close and lock
their doors
Privacy in its most basic forms
- text — records, diaries, letters, e-mail
- sound — phone conversations
- other –video
- phones, intercepts, cellular, wireless, car phones,
  scanners
- making listening illegal is useless (and wrong-headed)
  - and authorites are exempt from such laws
- people need to protect, end to end
- «How should I protect my personal files, and my phone
  calls?»
- Personally, I don’t worry too much. But many people do.
  Encryption tools are widely available.
- Cellular telephones are notoriously insecure, as are
  cordless phones (even less secure). There are laws
  about monitoring, small comfort as that may be. (And
  I’m largely opposed to such laws, for libertarian
  reasons and because it creates a false sense of
  security.)
- Laptops are probably less vulnerable to Van Eck types
  of RF monitoring than are CRTs. The trend to lower
  power, LCDs, etc., all works toward decreasing
  vulnerability. (However, computer power for extracting
  weak signals out of noise is increasing faster than RF
  are decreasing….tradeoffs are unclear.)
encrypting messages because mail delivery is so flaky
- that is, mail is misdelivered,via hosts incorrectly
  processing the addresses
- encryption obviously prevents misunderstandings (though
  it does little to get the mail delivered correctly)
Encryption to Protect Information
- the standard reason
- encryption of e-mail is increasing
- the various court cases about employers reading
  ostensibly private e-mail will sharpen this debate (and
  raise the issue of employers forbidding encryption;
  resonances with the mostly-settled issue of reasonable
  use of company phones for private calls-more efficient
  to let some personal calls be made than to lose the
  time of employees going to public phones)
- encryption of faxes will increase, too, especially as
  technology advances and as the dangers of interception
  become more apparent
- also, tighter links between sender and receive, as
  opposed to the current «dial the number and hope it’s
  the right one» approach, will encourage the additional
  use of encryption
- «electronic vaulting» of large amounts of information,
  sent over T1 and T3 data networks, e.g., backup material
  for banks and large corporations
- the miles and miles of network wiring within a
  corporation-LANs, WANs, Novell, Ethernet, TCP-IP, Banyan,
  and so on-cannot all be checked for taps…who would even
  have the records to know if some particular wire is going
  where it should? (so many undocumented hookups, lost
  records, ad hoc connections, etc.)
- the solution is to have point-to-point encryption, even
  withing corporations (for important items, at least)
- wireless LANs
- corporations are becoming increasingly concerned about
  interception of important information-or even seemingly
  minor information-and about hackers and other intruders
- calls for network security enhancement
- they are hiring «tiger teams» to beef up security
- cellular phones
  - interceptions are common (and this is becoming
    publicized)
  - modifications to commercial scanners are describe in
    newsletters
- something like Lotus Notes may be a main substrate for
  the effective introduction of crypto methods (ditto for
  hypertext)
- encryption provides «solidity» to cyberspace, in the
  sense of creating walls, doors, permanent structures
- there may even be legal requirements for better security
  over documents, patient files, employee records, etc.
- Encryption of Video Signals and Encryption to Control
  Piracy
- this is of course a whole technology and industry
- Videocypher II has been cracked by many video hackers
- a whole cottage industry in cracking such cyphers
- note that outlawing encryption would open up many
  industries to destruction by piracy, which is yet
  another reason a wholesale ban on encryption is doomed
  to failure
- Protecting home videos–several cases of home burglaries
  where private x-rated tapes of stars were taken, then
  sold (Leslile Visser, CBS Sports)
these general reasons will make encryption more common,
more socially and legally acceptable, and will hence make
eventual attempts to limit the use of crypto anarchy
methods moot
Digital Signatures and Authentication
- for electronic forms of contracts and digital
  timestamping
- not yet tested in the courts, though this should come
  soon (perhaps by 1996)
- could be very useful for proving that transactions happened at a certain time (Tom Clancy has a situation in «Debt of Honor» in which all Wall Street central records of stock trades are wiped out in a software scheme: only the records of traders are useful, and they are worried about these being fudged to turn profits…timestamping would help immensely)
  - though certain spoofs, a la the brilliant penny scam,
    are still possible (register multiple trades, only
    reveal the profitable ones)
- negotiations
- AMIX, Xanadu, etc.
- is the real protection against viruses (since all other
  scanning methods will increasingly fail)
- software authors and distributors «sign» their
  work…no virus writer can possibly forge the digital
  signature
Proofs of identity, passwords, and operating system use
- ZKIPS especially in networks, where the chances of seeing
  a password being transmitted are much greater (an obvious
  point that is not much discussed)
- operating systems and databases will need more secure
  procedures for access, for agents and the like to pay for
  services, etc.
- unforgeable tokens
- Cyberspace will need better protection
- to ensure spoofing and counterfeiting is reduced
  (recall Habitat’s problems with people figuring out the
  loopholes)
- if OH is also working on «world- building» at Los Alamos, he may be using evolutionary systems and abstract math to help build better and more «coherent» worlds
  - agents, demons, structures, persistent objects
  - encryption to protect these structures
  - the abstract math part of cyberspace: abstract
    measure spaces, topologies, distance metrics
  - may figure in to the balance between user
    malleabilty and rigidity of the space
  - Chaitin’s AIT…he has obtained measures for these
Digital Contracts
- e-mail too easily forged, faked (and lost, misplaced)
- Anonymity
- remailing
- law avoidance
- samizdats,
Smart cards, ATMs, etc.
Digital Money
Voting
Information Markets
- data havens, espionage
Privacy of Purchases
- for general principles, to prevent a surveillance society
- specialized mailing lists
- vendors pay to get names (Crest labels)
- Smalltalk job offers
- in electronic age, will be much easier to «troll» for
  specialized names
- people will want to «selectively disclose» their
  interests (actually, some will, some won’t)
  6.3.4. «What may limit the use of crypto?»
«It’s too hard to use»
- multiple protocols (just consider how hard it is to
  actually send encrypted messages between people today)
- the need to remember a password or passphrase
- «It’s too much trouble»
- the argument being that people will not bother to use
  passwords
- partly because they don’t think anything will happen to
  them
«What have you got to hide?»
- e.g.,, imagine some comments I’d have gotten at Intel had
  I encrypted everything
- and governments tend to view encryption as ipso facto
  proof that illegalities are being committed: drugs, money
  laundering, tax evasion
- recall the «forfeiture» controversy
Government is taking various steps to limit the use of encryption and secure communication
- some attempts have failed (S.266), some have been
  shelved, and almost none have yet been tested in the
  courts
- see the other sections…
Courts Are Falling Behind, Are Overcrowded, and Can’t Deal Adequately with New Issues-Such as Encryption and Cryonics
- which raises the issue of the «Science Court» again
- and migration to private adjudication (regulatory
  arbitrage)
BTW, anonymous systems are essentially the ultimate merit
system (in the obvious sense) and so fly in the face of the
«hiring by the numbers» de facto quota systems now
creeeping in to so many areas of life….there may be rules
requiring all business dealings to keep track of the sex,
race, and «ability group» (I’m kidding, I hope) of their
employees and their consultants
6.3.5. «What are some likely future uses of crypto?»
Video conferencing: without crypto, or with government
access, corporate meetings become public…as if a
government agent was sitting in a meeting, taking notes.
(There may be some who think this is a good idea, a check
on corporate shenanigans. I don’t. Much too high a price to
pay for marginal or illusory improvements.)
presenting unpopular views
getting and giving medical treatments
- with or without licenses from the medical union (AMA)
- unapproved treatments
bootleg medical treatments
information markets
sanctuary movements, underground railroads
- for battered wives
- and for fathers taking back their children
- (I’m not taking sides)
smuggling
tax evasion
data havens
bookies, betting, numbers games
remailers, anonymity
religious networks (digital confessionals)
digital cash, for privacy and for tax evasion
digital hits
newsgroup participation — archiving of Netnews is
commonplace, and increases in storage density make it
likely that in future years one will be able to purchase
disks with «Usenet, 1985-1995» and so forth (or access,
search, etc. online sites)
6.3.6. «Are there illegal uses of crypto?»
Currently, there are no blanket laws in the U.S. about
encryption.
There are specific situations in which encryption cannot be freely used (or the use is spelled out)
- over the amateur radio airwave…keys must be provided
Carl Elllison has noted many times that cryptography has been in use for many centuries; the notion that it is a «military» technology that civilians have some how gotten ahold of is just plain false.
- and even public key crypto was developed in a university
  (Stanford, then MIT)

6.4. Protection of Corporate and Financial Privacy
6.4.1. corporations are becoming increasingly concerned about
interception of important information-or even seemingly minor
information-and about hackers and other intruders

calls for network security enhancement
they are hiring «tiger teams» to beef up security
cellular phones
- interceptions are common (and this is becoming
  publicized)
- modifications to commercial scanners are describe in
  newsletters
something like Lotus Notes may be a main substrate for the
effective introduction of crypto methods (ditto for
hypertext)
6.4.2. Corporate Espionage (or «Business Research»)
Xeroxing of documents
- recall the way Murrray Woods inspected files of Fred
  Buch, suspecting he had removed the staples and Xeroxed
  the documents for Zilog (circa late 1977)
- a precedent: shapes of staples
- colors of the paper and ink…blues, for example
- but these low-tech schemes are easy to circumvent
Will corporations crack down on use of modems?
- after all, the specs of a chip or product could be mailed
  out of the company using the companies own networks!
- applies to outgoing letters as well (and I’ve never
  heard of any company inspecting to this detail, though
  it may happen at defense contractors)
- and messages can still be hidden (covert channels)
- albeit at much lower bandwidths and with more effort
  required (it’ll stop the casual leakage of information)
- the LSB method (though this still involves a digital
  storage means, e.g., a diskette, which might be
  restricted)
- various other schemes: buried in word processing format
  (at low bandwidth)
- subtleties such as covert channels are not even
  considered by corporations-too many leakage paths!
- it seems likely that government workers with security
  clearances will face restrictions on their access to AMIX-
  like systems, or even to «private» use of conventional
  databases
- at least when they use UseNet, the argument will go,
  they can be overseen to some extent
Offsite storage and access of stolen material
- instead of storing stolen blueprints and schematics on
  company premises, they may be stored at a remote location
- possiby unknown to the company, via cryptoanarchy
  techniques
«Business research» is the euphemism for corporate espionage
- often hiring ex-DIA and CIA agents
American companies may step up their economic espionage once it is revealed just how extensive the spying by European and Japanese companies has been
- Chobetsu reports to MITI
- Mossad aids Israeli companies, e.g., Elscint. Elbit
Bidzos calls this «a digital Pearl Harbor» (attacks on network security)
- would be ironic if weaknesses put into encryption gear
  came back to haunt us
corporations will want an arms length relationship with corporate spies, to protect themselves against lawsuits, criminal charges, etc.
- third party research agencies will be used
  6.4.3. Encryption to Protect Information
the standard reason
encryption of e-mail is increasing
- the various court cases about employers reading
  ostensibly private e-mail will sharpen this debate (and
  raise the issue of employers forbidding encryption;
  resonances with the mostly-settled issue of reasonable
  use of company phones for private calls-more efficient to
  let some personal calls be made than to lose the time of
  employees going to public phones)
encryption of faxes will increase, too, especially as technology advances and as the dangers of interception become more apparent
- also, tighter links between sender and receive, as
  opposed to the current «dial the number and hope it’s the
  right one» approach, will encourage the additional use of
  encryption
«electronic vaulting» of large amounts of information, sent
over T1 and T3 data networks, e.g., backup material for
banks and large corporations
the miles and miles of network wiring within a corporation-LANs, WANs, Novell, Ethernet, TCP-IP, Banyan, and so on-cannot all be checked for taps…who would even have the records to know if some particular wire is going where it should? (so many undocumented hookups, lost records, ad hoc connections, etc.)
- the solution is to have point-to-point encryption, even
  withing corporations (for important items, at least)
wireless LANs
encryption provides «solidity» to cyberspace, in the sense
of creating walls, doors, permanent structures
there may even be legal requirements for better security
over documents, patient files, employee records, etc.
6.4.4. U.S. willing to seize assets as they pass through U.S.
(Haiti, Iraq)
6.4.5. Privacy of research
attacks on tobacco companies, demanding their private
research documents be turned over to the FDA (because
tobacco is ‘fair game» for all such attacks, …)
6.4.6. Using crypto-mediated business to bypass «deep pockets»
liability suits, abuse of regulations, of the court system,
etc.
Abuses of Lawsuits: the trend of massive judgments…several million for a woman burned when she spilled hot coffee at a MacDonald’s ($160K for damages, the rest for «punitive damages»)
- billions of dollars for various jury decisions
- «deep pockets» lawsuits are a new form of populism, of de
  Tocqueville’s pocket-picking
For example, a shareware author might collect digital cash without being traceable by those who feel wronged
- Is this «right»? Well , what does the contract say? If
  the customer bought or used the product knowing that the
  author/seller was untraceable, and that no additional
  warranties or guarantees were given, what fraud was
  committed?
crypto can, with some costs, take interactions out of the reach of courts
- replacing the courts with PPL-style private-produced
  justice
  6.4.7. on anonymous communication and corporations
Most corporations will avoid anonymous communications,
fearing the repercussions, the illegality (vis-a-vis
antitrust law), and the «unwholesomeness» of it
Some may use it to access competitor intelligence, offshore data havens, etc.
- Even here, probably through «arm’s length» relationships
  with outside consultants, analogous to the cutouts used
  by the CIA and whatnot to insulate themselves from
  charges
Boldest of all will be the «crypto-zaibatsu» that use
strong crypto of the crypto anarchy flavor to arrange
collusive deals, to remove competitors via force, and to
generally pursue the «darker side of the force,» to coin a
phrase.

6.5. Digital Signatures
6.5.1. for electronic forms of contracts

not yet tested in the courts, though this should come soon
(perhaps by 1996)
6.5.2. negotiations
6.5.3. AMIX, Xanadu, etc.
6.5.4. is the real protection against viruses (since all other
scanning methods will increasingly fail)
software authors and distributors «sign» their work…no
virus writer can possibly forge the digital signature

6.6. Political Uses of Crypto
6.6.1. Dissidents, Amnesty International

Most governments want to know what their subjects are
saying…
Strong crypto (including steganography to hide the
existence of the communications) is needed
Myanmar (Burma) dissidents are known to be using PGP
6.6.2. reports that rebels in Chiapas (Mexico, Zapatistas) are on
the Net, presumably using PGP
(if NSA can really crack PGP, this is probably a prime
target for sharing with the Mexican government)
6.6.3. Free speech has declined in America–crypto provides an
antidote
people are sued for expressing opinions, books are banned
(«Loompanics Press» facing investigations, because some
children ordered some books)
SLAPP suits (Strategic Lawsuiits Against Public Participation), designed to scare off differing opinions by threatening legal ruination in the courts
- some judges have found for the defendants and ordered the
  SLAPPers to pay damages themselves, but this is still a
  speech-chilling trend
crypto untraceability is good immunity to this trend, and
is thus real free speech

6.7. Beyond Good and Evil, or, Why Crypto is Needed
6.7.1. «Why is cryptography good? Why is anonymity good?»

These moral questions pop up on the List once in a while,
often asked by someone preparing to write a paper for a
class on ethics or whatnot. Most of us on the list probably
think the answers are clearly «yes,» but many in the public
may not think so. The old dichotomy between «None of your
damned business» and «What have you got to hide?»
«Is it good that people can write diaried unread by
others?» «Is it good that people can talk to each other
without law enforcement knowing what they’re saying?» «Is
it good that people can lock their doors and hide from
outsiders?» These are all essentially equivalent to the
questions above.
Anonymity may not be either good or not good, but the
outlawing of anonymity would require a police state to
enforce, would impinge on basic ideas about private
transactions, and would foreclose many options that some
degree of anonymity makes possible.
«People should not be anonymous» is a normative statement
that is impractical to enforce.
6.7.2. Speaking of the isolation from physical threats and pressures
that cyberspace provides, Eric Hughes writes: «One of the
whole points of anonymity and pseudonymity is to create
immunity from these threats, which are all based upon the
human body and its physical surroundings. What is the point
of a system of anonymity which can be pierced when something
«bad» happens? These systems do not reject the regime of
violence; rather, they merely mitigate it slightly further
and make their morality a bit more explicit…..I desire
systems which do not require violence for their existence and
stability. I desire anonymity as an ally to break the hold
of morality over culture.» [Eric Hughes, 1994-08-31]
6.7.3. Crypto anarchy means prosperity for those who can grab it,
those competent enough to have something of value to offer
for sale; the clueless 95% will suffer, but that is only
just. With crypto anarchy we can painlessly, without
initiation of aggression, dispose of the nonproductive, the
halt and the lame. (Charity is always possible, but I suspect
even the liberal do-gooders will throw up their hands at the
prospect of a nation of mostly unskilled and essentially
illiterate and innumerate workers being unable to get
meaninful, well-paying jobs.)
6.7.4. Crypto gets more important as communication increases and as
computing gets distributed
with bits and pieces of one’s environment scattered around
- have to worry about security
- others have to also protect their own products, and yet
  still provide/sell access
private spaces needed in disparate
locations…multinationals, teleconferencing, video

6.8. Crypo Needed for Operating Systems and Networks
6.8.1. Restrictions on cryptography–difficult as they may be to
enforce–may also impose severe hardships on secure operating
system design, Norm Hardy has made this point several times.

Agents and objects inside computer systems will likely need
security, credentials, robustness, and even digital money
for transactions.
6.8.2. Proofs of identity, passwords, and operating system use
ZKIPS especially in networks, where the chances of seeing a
password being transmitted are much greater (an obvious
point that is not much discussed)
operating systems and databases will need more secure procedures for access, for agents and the like to pay for services, etc.
- unforgeable tokens
  6.8.3. An often unmentioned reason why encyption is needed is for
  the creation of private, or virtual, networks
so that channels are independent of the «common carrier»
to make this clear: prospects are dangerously high for a consolidation under government control of networks
- in parallel with roads
- and like roads, may insist on equivalent of licenses
- is-a-person
- bans on encryption
- The Nightmare Scenario: «We own the networks, we won’t
  let anyone install new networks without our approval, and
  we will make the laws about what gets carried, what
  encryption can be used, and how taxes will be collected.»
- Fortunately, I doubt this is enforceable…too many ways
  to create virtual networks…satellites like Iridium,
  fiber optics, ways to hide crypto or bury it in other
  traffic
cyberspace walls…
- more than just crypto: physical security is needed (and
  for much the same reason no «digital coin» exists)
- processes running on controlled-accesss machines (as
  with remailers)
- access by crypto
- a web of mutually suspicious machines may be sufficient
- robust cyberspaces built with DC-Net («dining
  cryptographers») methods?

6.9. Ominous Trends
6.9.1. Ever-increasing numbers of laws, complexities of tax codes,
etc.

individuals no longer can navigate
6.9.2. National ID cards
work permits, immigration concerns, welfare fraud, stopping
terrorists, collecting taxes
USPS and other proposals
6.9.3. Key Escrow
6.9.4. Extension of U.S. law around the world
Now that the U.S. has vanquished the U.S.S.R., a free field
ahead of it for spreading the New World Order, led of
course by the U.S.A. and its politicians.
treaties, international agreements
economic hegemony
U.N. mandates, forces, «blue helmets»
6.9.5. AA BBS case means cyberspace is not what we though it was

6.10. Loose Ends
6.10.1. «Why don’t most people pay more attention to security
issues?»

Fact is, most people never think about real security.
Safe manufacturers have said that improvements in safes
(the metal kind) were driven by insurance rates. A direct
incentive to spend more
money to improve security (cost of better safe < cost of
higher insurance rate).
Right now there is almost no economic incentive for people
to worry
about PIN security, about protecting their files, etc.
(Banks eat the
costs and pass them on…any bank which tried to save a few
bucks in
losses by requiring 10-digit PINs–which people would
write down
anyway!–would lose customers. Holograms and pictures on
bank cards
are happening because the costs have dropped enough.)
Crypto is economics. People will begin to really care when
it costs them.

6.10.2. What motivates an attackers is not the intrinsic value of the
data but his perception of the value of the data.
6.10.3. Crypto allows more refinement of permissions…access to
groups, lists

beyond such crude methods as banning domain names or «edu»
sorts of accounts
6.10.4. these general reasons will make encryption more common, more
socially and legally acceptable, and will hence make eventual
attempts to limit the use of crypto anarchy methods moot
6.10.5. protecting reading habits..
(Imagine using your MicroSoftCashCard for library
checkouts…)
6.10.6. Downsides
loss of trust
markets in unsavory things
espionage
expect to see new kinds of con jobs
- confidence games
- «Make Digital Money Fast»
  6.10.7. Encryption of Video Signals and Encryption to Control Piracy
this is of course a whole technology and industry
Videocypher II has been cracked by many video hackers
a whole cottage industry in cracking such cyphers
note that outlawing encryption would open up many
industries to destruction by piracy, which is yet another
reason a wholesale ban on encryption is doomed to failure

Descubre más desde Anonimato, Privacidad, Hacking & ++

Suscríbete y recibe las últimas entradas en tu correo electrónico.

6. The Need For Strong Crypto

Descubre más desde Anonimato, Privacidad, Hacking & ++

Relacionado